Broad fit first, sensitive files later
Visitors can start with product type, stage and safe context. Detailed product files, supplier details and confidential notes can wait until NDA terms are agreed.
Focused case formats show how product risk is clarified before prototype spend, tooling deposits, supplier approval or pilot production.

V2 treats cases as proof assets. The important question is not the industry label, but what decision the buyer needed to make next.
The site should not fake client names or confidential data. It should show the decision path, artifacts and buyer risk each case is designed to prove.
Visitors can start with product type, stage and safe context. Detailed product files, supplier details and confidential notes can wait until NDA terms are agreed.
IP assignment, editable-file ownership, manufacturing rights and usage limits should be written into the project agreement before deeper work starts.
The conversion goal is a practical development path: what to review, what to prepare and whether the next step should be design, prototype, DFM or supplier follow-through.
Project intake is structured for US buyers while supplier, sample and production-follow-up questions can be handled close to the manufacturing base.
The strongest cases show the risk, the project artifact and the next spend decision instead of relying on final renderings alone.

Brief, references, constraints and current files are mapped before scope is recommended.

3D structure, assembly logic and exploded views make supplier handoff easier to review.

Sample route, fit checks and revision notes show what the next prototype should prove.

DFM notes, supplier questions and pilot gates reduce late surprises before tooling or launch.
Each case card now leads with risk and inspectable evidence so a buyer can quickly find the closest project situation.

Risk: Exterior styling could easily block ports, vents, antenna clearance, screw bosses or prototype assembly.
Evidence: Product architecture map for PCB, ports, buttons, vents and service access.
Review case evidence
Risk: Wall thickness, ribs, bosses, draft, snap fits and parting lines could create tooling revisions or sample defects.
Evidence: DFM notes for wall thickness, ribs, bosses, draft and shutoff risks.
Review case evidence
Risk: Jumping straight to a polished sample could hide ergonomics, assembly and cost issues until too late.
Evidence: Use-flow map for handling, cleaning, interaction and storage moments.
Review case evidence
Risk: Approving the next run without evidence could repeat defects, confuse the supplier and weaken buyer confidence.
Evidence: Sample defect log and revision tracker.
Review case evidenceThe goal is to show decision evidence, not only finished visuals. Each page connects buyer concern, design response, proof assets and the next project intake.
The commercial or technical risk that makes the buyer hesitate before spending.
3D files, prototype, DFM, sample or supplier-review proof that can be inspected.
A clear project-review path that tells a similar buyer what to prepare.